The influence of organizational culture and shared leadership on work-family conflict and employee job satisfaction

Download This Article

Duc Ho Dai ORCID logo

https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv8i2p18

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the influence of organizational culture and shared leadership on work-family conflict (WFC) and employee job satisfaction, within the context of businesses in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam. A survey was conducted involving 592 employees, and linear structural equation modeling (SEM) was utilized for data analysis. With the exception of the negative impact of external orientation culture value and task-oriented leadership style on job satisfaction, the study revealed that organizational cultural values and shared leadership have a favorable impact on reducing WFC and enhancing employee job satisfaction. A noteworthy discovery from this research is that organizational cultural values and shared leadership style not only mitigate WFC but also foster higher employee job satisfaction. As a result, it is recommended that enterprises prioritize the development of organizational cultural values and shared leadership models to bolster job satisfaction, increase employee loyalty, and consequently, enhance overall firm performance.

Keywords: Organizational Culture, Shared Leadership, Work-Family Conflict, Job Satisfaction

Authors’ individual contribution: The Author is responsible for all the contributions to the paper according to CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) standards.

Declaration of conflicting interests: The Author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

JEL Classification: C2, L2, M1

Received: 14.11.2023
Accepted: 03.05.2024
Published online: 06.05.2024

How to cite this paper: Ho Dai, D. (2024). The influence of organizational culture and shared leadership on work-family conflict and employee job satisfaction. Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 8(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv8i2p18