A collection of empirical papers on corporate (firm) performance UPDATED May 7, 2018

The editorial team of the publishing house “Virtus Interpress” has prepared the list of empirical papers published in Corporate Ownership and Control journal during last few years devoted to the questions of corporate (firm) performance.

We hope that the aforementioned collection of papers will be useful for those scholars pursuing research in the field of corporate governance (specifically corporate/firm performance issues):

  1. Rukundo, J. B. (2017). Firm performance and innovation in the developing countries: Evidence from firm-level survey. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1-1), 235-245. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c1p7
  2. Cambrea, D. R., Lussana, G., Quarato, F., & Varacca Capello, P. (2017). Top management team diversity and firm performance: Empirical evidence from the fashion and luxury industry. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1-2), 325-340. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c2p2
  3. Scafarto, V., Ricci, F., Della Corte, G., & De Luca, P. (2017). Board structure, ownership concentration and corporate performance: Italian evidence. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1-2), 347-359. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c2p4
  4. Owusu, A., Holmes, M., & Agyemang, J. (2017). The performance consequences of board structure changes: Evidence from Ghana. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1-2), 421-434.http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c2p11
  5. Tuccillo, D., Ferrone, C., & Agliata, F. (2018). Evaluation of the integration between corporate and financial performance: The social impact bond financial instrument. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(3), 138-144. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i3art12
  6. Ntoung, A. T. L., Vila Biglieri, J. E., Outman, B. C., Masárová, E., Babounia, A., & Kome, C. M. (2017). Family firms and performance empirical analysis from Spain. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4-2), 380-395. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4c2art4
  7. Hassouna, D., Ouda, H., & Hussainey, K. (2017). Transparency and disclosure as an internal corporate governance mechanism and corporate performance: Egypt’s case. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4-1), 182-195. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4c1art1
  8. Hundal, S. (2017). Multiple directorships of corporate boards and firm performance in India. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4), 150-164. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4art13
  9. Kyriazopoulos, G. (2017). Corporate governance and firm performance in periods of financial distress. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(3-1), 209-222. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i3c1art7
  10. Abdullah, S. N. (2016). Corporate governance mechanisms and the performance of Malaysian listed firms. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(1-2), 384-398. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i1c2p10
  11. Haryono, U., Iskandar, R., Paminto, A., & Ulfah, Y. (2016). Sustainability performance: It’s impact on risk and value of the firm. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(1-1), 278-286. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i1c1p11
  12. Ganguli, S. K. (2016). Persistent high liquidity, ownership structure and firm performance: Indian evidence. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(1), 38-47. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i1p4
  13. Zemzem, A., & Ftouhi, K. (2016). External corporate governance, tax planning, and firm performance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(3-3), 523-532. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i3c3p11
  14. Iacoviello, G., Mazzei, M., & Riccardi, G. (2015). The gender composition of the board and firm performance. The role of regulatory measures. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-11), 1385-1395. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i10
  15. Portal, M. T., & Basso, L. F. C. (2015). The effect of family control and management on performance, capital structure, cash holding, and cash dividends. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-10), 1134-1149. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c10p2
  16. Mateus, C., Hall, T., & Mateus, I. B. (2015). Are listed firms better governed? Empirical evidence on board structure and financial performance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-7), 736-755. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c7p2
  17. Ndayisaba, G., & Ahmed, A. D. (2015). CEO remuneration, board composition and firm performance: empirical evidence from Australian listed companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-5), 534-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c5p2
  18. Bruno, P., & Carvalhal, A. (2015). Firm valuation, performance and origin of controlling shareholder in Brazil. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(4-5), 535-540. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i4c5p3
  19. Nulla, Y. M. (2015). Pay for performance: An empirical review. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(4), 69-79. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i4p5
  20. Farooq, S., Ahmed, S., & Saleem, K. (2015). Overinvestment, growth opportunities and firm performance: Evidence from Singapore stock market. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(3-4), 454-467. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i3c4p6
  21. Basuony, M. A. K., Elseidi, R. I., & Mohamed, E. K. A. (2014). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm performance: Evidence form a MENA country. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(1-9), 761-774. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i1c9p1
  22. Wang, Y., & Chen, C. W. (2014). Board structure, D&O insurance and the variability of firm performance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(1-2), 259-270. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i1c2p4
  23. Cheng, M. A., & Leung, N. W. (2014). Ownership structure, ongoing related party transactions and corporate performance: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(2-5), 446-464. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i2c5p2
  24. Farooq, O., & Satt, H. (2014). Does analyst following improve firm performance? Evidence from the MENA region. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(2-1), 157-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i2c1p1
  25. Mohamed, E. K. A., Basuony, M. A., & Badawi, A. A. (2013). The impact of corporate governance on firm performance in Egyptian listed companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(1-7), 691-705. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i1c7art6
  26. Kanagaretnam, K., Lobo, G. J., & Whalen, D. J. (2013). Relationship between board independence and firm performance post Sarbanes Oxley. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(1), 65-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i1art6
  27. Di Carlo, E., & Ranalli, F. (2013). Corporate performance and boards’ dilemma of listed subsidiaries. Corporate Ownership & Control, 10(4), 130-147. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i4art10
  28. Emmanuel, T., Carvalhal, A., & Avila, M. (2012). Does social responsibility matter for firm performance? Evidence from Brazil. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(3), 132-141. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i3art11
  29. Jiang, H., & Habib, A. (2012). Ownership concentration, free cash flow agency problem and future firm performance: New Zealand evidence. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(3), 96-110. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i3art8
  30. Hu, D., & Zheng, H. (2012). Corporate governance and performance: Evidence from Chinese private listed companies based on cash flow rights and control rights. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(2), 85-93. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i2art7