Virtus InterPress


Isaac Mazaba, Willem Adriaan Lotter, Thomas Wolfgang Thurner

DOI: 10.22495/cocv10i2c4art6


The question of whether or not a company will be able to continue to do business is at the core of every audit. Despite the importance of this part of the audit, little is known about what triggers an auditor to issue a qualified opinion based on going-concern uncertainties. Previous research has suggested that the auditor might act strategically, using, e.g., ambiguous wording to avoid a qualification and negative consequences for the client and still communicate his concerns. Yet these studies failed to explain in what instances auditors use such strategies. We use a sample of 90 companies that were delisted from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange or received a qualified opinion, and show that the issuance of a qualified opinion is not correlated with the company’s financial situation at all. We therefore suggest that the auditor’s own risk assessment— whether or not he might risk a lawsuit if a due going-concern assumption is not issued—might explain much more about his decision than do specifics about the client company.

Keywords: Audit, Risk, Stock Exchange, Finance

How to cite this paper: Mazaba, I., Lotter, W. A., & Thurner, T. W. (2013). Looking into the expectation gap - What are going-concern assumptions really about? Corporate Ownership & Control, 10(2-4), 714-720.

Download This Article
Corporate Governance Experts Global Repository
Merio Honor Честь
Ryoushin Conscience Совесть
Kouki Nobility Доброе имя